necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Res.9
by
HungryDad
from
ビクトリア 2007/01/20 08:42:04
↑"The right to keep and bear arms" is not necessary
for personal protection and security if the law does
not allow the general public, other than licensed
hunters and other qualified individuals, to purchace
and keep fire arms at hand so easily. The only reason
any harmless person keeps a hand gun in her glove
compartment is to protect herself from other potentially
dangerous people who have free access to hand guns. You
do not have to free guns to maintain a free state. A free
state will be freer if a stricter gun control law is
implemented.